2002
CTOS Annual Meeting Posters
— Medical Oncology
IN
VITRO CHEMOSENSITIVITY OF HUMAN SOFT TISSUE SARCOMA TISSUE
[Abstract
ID: 63]
Category:
Medical Oncology
Authors:
Hideo Morioka1
Author Institutions:
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery School of Medicine
Keio University, Tokyo, Japan; 2Department of Surgery
School of Medicine Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
Presenter:
Hideo Morioka
morioka@sc.itc.keio.ac.jp
Correspondent:
Hideo Morioka
morioka@sc.itc.keio.ac.jp
Tokyo Tokyo Japan 160-8582
Ph: +81-3-5363-3812
Fax: +81-3-3353-6597
Objectives: The
Histoculture Drug Response Assay (HDRA) is an in vitro chemosensitivity
test that has a high correlation with clinical response, the usefulness
of which has been reported in various kinds of solid tumors. In
this study, in order to investigate the variation in chemosensitivity
in STS, fresh biopsy or surgical samples of STS were tested using
the HDRA methods.
Methods: Eighty samples of fresh human STS were obtained
during either the biopsy or surgical removal at Keio University
Hospital in Japan between 1997 and 2001. As anti-tumor drugs, cisplatin
(CDDP), doxorubicin (ADM), pirarubicin (THP), 4-hydroxy-ifosfamide
(4-H-IFO) and etoposide (VP-16) were used. HDRA was performed according
to the method previously reported.
Results: Drug sensitivity testing by HDRA showed that two
drugs, ADM and THP, had a significantly higher inhibitory rate than
CDDP, IFOS, or VP-16 in the eighty soft tissue sarcomas tested.
Depending on the morphological type, spindle cell sarcomas were
sensitive to THP, which showed significantly higher inhibition rates
than CDDP, IFOS, or VP-16. Small round cell sarcomas were relatively
sensitive to all of the drugs tested. However the drug sensitivity
of pleomorphic cell sarcoma was low except for ADM and THP, while
its sensitivity to THP was higher than about 70%.
Conclusions: Depending on the morphological type, STS showed
various chemosensitivity in HDRA. However, there are numerous other
soft tissue sarcomas that do not belong to these categories; drug
sensitivity testing in each of them and the devising of individualized
treatment strategies seems necessary to improve the therapeutic
outcome.
 |
 |
|