2002
CTOS Annual Meeting Posters
— Surgery
RECONSTRUCTION
WITH SCAPULAR ENDORPROSTHESIS PROVIDES SUPERIOR RESULTS AFTER TOTAL
SCAPULAR RESECTION: SURGICAL TECHNIQUE AND COMPARISON TO PATIENTS
WITHOUT ENDOPROSTHETIC RECONSTRUCTION
[Abstract
ID: 58]
Category:
Surgery
Authors:
Felasfa M Wodajo1, Jacob Bickels2, James C
Wittig3, Kristen Kellar-Graney1, Yehuda Kollender2,
Isaac Meller2, Martin M Malawer1
Author Institutions:
1Washington Cancer Institute, DC, United States; 2Tel
Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Israel; 3NYU Medical Center
Tisch Hospital, NY, United States
Presenter:
Felasfa M Wodajo
felasfa@earthlink.net
Correspondent:
Felasfa M Wodajo
felasfa@earthlink.net
Washington DC United States 20010
Ph: 202-877-7561
Fax: 202-877-8959
Objectives: Suspension
of the humeral head from the clavicle after total scapular resection
is compared to endoprosthetic scapular reconstruction. The surgical
technique of endoprosthetic reconstruction and functional results
are described.
Patients
23 patients with scapular tumors requiring total scapular resection
were treated. Resection included 12 total scapulectomies and 11
en-bloc resections of the scapula and humeral head. Seven patients
received endoprostheses. Four had prosthetic humeral heads suspended
from the clavicle and 12 had suspension of the native humeral head.
All patients were followed more than 2 years.
Methods: Endoprosthetic Surgical Technique
Patient selection was crucial. All peri-scapular muscles were tumor-free.
Resection was usually performed using a posterior approach. Most
high-grade scapula tumors were resected with the proximal humerus.
Smaller than a natural scapula, the prosthesis facilitated soft-tissue
reconstruction and was multiply fenestrated for myodesis. It was
placed on the serratus anterior and covered by the rhomboids, trapezius
and latissimus. A curved humeral head prosthesis was cemented into
the humerus and connected to the scapular prosthesis using Gore-tex.
Results: There were no deep wound infections, failures, or
secondary amputations. Elbow range-of-motion and hand dexterity
were similar. Patients with scapular endoprosthesis had better active
abduction (60 - 90 vs. 10 - 20). Patients with endoprosthetic reconstruction
had a more natural contour. 6 patients with scapular prostheses
(86%) and 10 patients with humeral suspensions (62%) had a good-to-excellent
functional outcome.
 |
 |
|