2002 CTOS
Annual Meeting Oral Presentations — Diagnostic Radiology
FDG-
POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY (PET) IN STAGING AND MANAGING PATIENTS
WITH SOFT TISSUE SARCOMAS
[Abstract
ID: 61]
Category:
Diagnostic Radiology
Presentation:
Oral
Authors: Thomas
F. DeLaney1, Francis J. Hornicek1, Mark C.
Gebhardt1, Mark J. Ott1, Alan Fischman1,
Peter A. Chapman1, Andrew R. Rosenberg1, Daniel
I. Rosenthal1, David C. Harmon1, Herman D.
Suit1
Author Institutions:
1Massachusetts General Hospital, MA, United States
Presenter: Thomas
F. DeLaney
tdelaney@partners.org
Correspondent:
Thomas F. DeLaney
tdelaney@partners.org
Boston MA United States 02114
Ph: 617-726-7869
Fax: 617-724-9532
Objectives: FDG
(2-18fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose) PET scanning is useful for oncologic
staging and treatment assessment. We evaluated its role in patients
with soft tissue sarcomas.
Methods: 59 patients underwent 97 PET scans, 50 at initial
staging, which included primary site MRI and chest CT. PET activity
was scored as 0=normal, 1= minimal, 2=moderate, and 3= intense.
PET results were compared with chest CT to assess sensitivity /specificity.
Most patients underwent neoadjuvant radiation or chemoradiation
followed 3-4 weeks later by surgery. Re-staging PET, MRI, and chest
CT were performed 1-3 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy and PET activity
in the primary site was correlated to residual tumor in the surgical
specimen.
Results: Increased activity was seen at the primary site
in 47 patients (94 %); median and mean activity scores were respectively
3 and 2.75. Two patients without PET activity had undergone excisional
biopsy; a third had grade 1 liposarcoma. Sensitivity and specificity
for PET for detecting lung metastases were 0.09 and 0.97 respectively,
compared to 0.75 and 0.83 for chest CT. Positive and negative predictive
values for PET were 0.50 and 0.77 compared to 0.56 and 0.92 for
chest CT. On 39 re-staging PETs after neoadjuvant treatment, there
was less activity, median score 2 and mean 2.18. No clear relationship
emerged between residual activity and percent necrosis in the surgical
specimen, although this has not yet been corrected for tumor grade.
Conclusions: Soft tissue sarcomas are FDG avid at the primary
site; activity decreases with neoadjuvant therapy. PET scanning
is not useful for detection of lung metastases.
 |
 |
|