2001
CTOS Annual Meeting Posters— Pathology
EXPRESSION OF HER2/NEU
(HER2) AND EGFR IN OSTEOSARCOMA (OS)
James C Wittig1, Lorna Cruz3, Felasfa
Wodajo1, WM Chu2, Kristen L Kellar-Graney1,
Nita Seibel4, Dhruv Kumar3, Martin
M Malawer1, Dennis A Priebat2
1Dept of Orthopedic Oncology Washington Cancer Institute
Washington Hospital Center, 2Deptartment of Hematology/Oncology
Washington Cancer Institute Washington Hospital Center, 3Department
of Pathology Washington Hospital Center, 4Children's
National Medical Center Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology
OBJECTIVE: Overexpression of protooncogenes and cellular growth
factor receptors have been implicated in the development of osteosarcomas.
HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) is a 185-Kd transmembrane
glycoprotein receptor that is the product of the c-erbB-2 protooncogene.
It is structurally homologous to EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor).
Recent studies have reported that 42%-45% of OS overexpress HER2 and
that overexpression of HER2 in OS correlates with a worse event-free
survival, and a poor histologic response to induction chemotherapy.
This has stimulated interest in investigating the use of anti-HER2
monoclonal antibodies in treatment protocols as part of initial or
salvage chemotherapy regimens for poor prognosis patients. Expression
of EGFR in OS has not been thoroughly investigated although its overexpression
by other tumor types has been correlated with a poor prognosis. The
purpose of this study was to examine the expression of HER2 and EGFR
in OS and to determine the relationship between overexpression and
survival, response to induction chemotherapy, local and systemic recurrence,
and various other potential prognostic factors.
METHODS: Archival paraffin embedded tissue from 32 patients
with the diagnosis of high-grade OS were stained for HER2 (Hercep
Test- DAKO Corp) and EGFR (Mouse Anti-EGFR, ZYMED LABS) via standard
immunohistochemical techniques. Cellular membrane staining was graded
0 to 3+ according to intensity. The receptors were considered to
be overexpressed if grade 2 or 3 staining was present.
RESULTS: HER2 was not expressed in any specimen. (All specimens
demonstrated grade 0 staining for HER2.) EGFR was overexpressed
in five (16%) specimens. Overexpression of EGFR did not correlate
with prognosis or with any significant prognostic variables.
CONCLUSION: HER2 and EGFR do not demonstrate significant
nor consistent overexpression by OS cells. They are unlikely to
represent important prognostic variables. Therapy with anti-HER2
antibody or IMC-C225 (anti-EGFR ab) may not be beneficial. Further
investigation is required.
|