2001
CTOS Annual Meeting Posters— Surgery
CLOSE SURGICAL MARGINS
IN SOFT TISSUE SARCOMA RESECTION DO NOT PREDICT LOCAL RECURRENCE
WHEN INDUCTION (NEOADJUVANT) CHEMOTHERAPY IS USED IN THE TREATMENT
OF HIGH GRADE EXTREMITY SOFT TISSUE SARCOMA
Felasfa M. Wodajo, James Wittig, Kari Mansour, Dennis
Priebat, Robert Henshaw, Martin Malawer
Washington Cancer Institute Washington Hospital Center
OBJECTIVE: Surgical resection with "wide" margins, i.e. with
a rim of normal of tissue, is the mainstay of local control for high
grade soft tissue sarcoma. The objective of this study is to assess
whether the presence of close or microscopically positive surgical
margins contributes to local recurrence and what role, if any, induction
chemotherapy without preoperative radiation plays in prevention of
local recurrence after limb-sparing resection of soft tissue sarcomas
METHODS: During the period of 1988 to the present, over
100 resections for high-grade soft tissue sarcomas were performed
by the same surgical team. Of these, 58 whose tumors were deep,
large (more than 5 cm) and high grade were eligible for enrollment
into a chemotherapy protocol consisting of neoadjuvant plus adjuvant
doxorubucin, intra-arterial cisplatin and, after 1996, ifosfomide.
Patients did not undergo preoperative radiation but those with poor
chemotherepeutic response and close surgical margins also underwent
adjuvant external beam radiotherapy. Twenty nine patients who underwent
their first surgery after induction chemotherapy and have follow-up
of two years or more form the basis of this report. Pathology reports
from 15 of these cases specify a margin depth in centimeters.
RESULTS: The overall local recurrence rate was 6.9% (2/29).
For the 27 patients without local recurrence, 14 (52%) have pathology
reports specifying margin depth. Of these 10/14 (71%) had a minimum
distance of less than or equal to 5 mm from the tumor to the inked
margin whereas 1/14 (7%) had a "positive" margin, where tumor is
focally present at the inked margin. Among the 2 patients with local
recurrence, 1 (50%) has a pathology report specifying the margin
depth which was less than or equal to 5 mm. Pathology reports not
specifying margin depth stated generally that the margins were "free
of tumor". Adjuvant radiotherapy was administered to 1 (50%) patient
with local recurrence (margin depth not specified) and 3 (11%) patients
without local recurrence all of whom had 20% or less tumor necrosis
(one margin less than 5 mm, one margin unspecified). The maximum
tumor diameter in non-recurring and recurring patients averaged
11.2 cm and 15.8 cm, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Even with the use of adjuvant radiotherapy,
several recent large reviews have reported 20% - 25% local recurrence
rates with the most important risk factor being the surgical margins
of the resection specimen. In our series, there was only a 7% local
recurrence rate which is even more remarkable when it is noted that,
of the patients without local recurrence who had exact margins recorded,
nearly 80% had a surgical margin of 5mm or less. Thus the presence
of microscopically close or positive resection margins in our series
did not correlate with local recurrence. Furthermore, only 4/29
(14%) patients underwent postoperative radiotherapy and no patient
underwent preoperative radiotherapy suggesting that radiation did
not significantly contribute to this low recurrence rate. While
systemic chemotherapy is generally administered in an attempt to
improve overall survival, our results imply that the killing of
malignant cells in the periphery of tumors with induction chemotherapy
can improve local control and postoperative function by allowing
for the removal of a minimum amount of normal tissue with an acceptable
rate of local recurrence.
 |
 |
|