2001
CTOS Annual Meeting Posters— Surgery
EXTENSILE
EXPOSURE OF THE AXILLA
Eran Maman1, Jacob Bickels1, James
C Wittig2, Kristen L. Kellar-Graney2,
Yehuda Kollender1, Isaac Meller1,
Martin Miles Malawer2
1National Unit of Orthopedic Oncology Tel-Aviv Sourasky
Medical Center, 2Division of Orthopedic Oncology
Washington Cancer Institute Washington Hospital Center
OBJECTIVE: Tumors of the axilla impose a surgical difficulty
because they are usually large at presentation and in close proximity
to the major neurovascular bundle of the upper extremity. Attempted
tumor resection via the base of the axilla is difficult because of
limitations in full visualization of the lesion and identification
and mobilization of the neurovascular bundle prior to resection. The
authors have used a safe and reliable exposure for these situations.
METHODS: Between 1980 and 1997, 35 patients underwent extensile
exposure of an axillary tumor. Diagnoses included 19 primary and
16 metastatic tumors of the axilla. The axillary cavity was fully
exposed via the deltopectoral groove after detachment and reflection
of two layers of muscles: first, the pectoralis major and, second,
the coracoid origin of the pectoralis minor, coracobrachialis, and
the short head of the biceps muscle. This surgical approach allowed
full tumor visualization and determination of the exact anatomic
relation of the tumor to the neurovascular bundle and as a result,
tumor resectability. Following resection, the pectoralis minor and
conjoined tendons were reattached to the coracoid process with a
nonabsorbable suture, and the pectoralis major was reattached to
its insertion site on the proximal humerus in the same manner.
RESULTS: Exposure revealed a safe plane of dissection between
the tumor and the major neurovascular bundle in 23 patients and
invasion of the major neurovascular bundle in 12 patients who subsequently
underwent a forequarter amputation. At the most recent follow-up,
none of these patients had functional limitation, which could be
attributed to the extensile approach itself. All patients gained
their presurgical pectoralis major and biceps function. Complications
in the group of patients that underwent tumor resection included
three (13%) superficial wound infections. Due to intended, enbloc
resection of an involved nerve with the tumor, two nerve palsies
(8.7%) were documented. None of the remaining 21 patients had numbness,
paresthesias, or nerve pain. There were three (13%) local recurrences;
two were managed with wide excision and adjuvant radiation therapy
and one necessitated amputation.
CONCLUSION: The extensile exposure of the axilla allows
full visualization of axillary tumors. It allows determination of
tumor resectability and safe and reliable resection, when indicated.
This exposure is associated with good functional outcome and an
acceptable morbidity. The extensile axillary exposure is recommended
in the management of axillary tumors.
|