Posters—
Diagnostic Imaging/Pathology
GOOD
PATHOLOGICAL RESPONSE TO NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS SHOWING
CLINICAL OR RADIOLOGICAL PROGRESSION OF DISEASE – 3 CLINCAL CASES
Plummer R, Lucraft H, Murray S, Malcolm A, Dildey
P, Grainger A, Baudouin C, Verrill M. (North of England Bone and Soft
tissue Tumour Service, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE7 7DN
UK.)
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has an established role in the
treatment of head and neck carcinoma, breast cancer and osteosarcoma.
As well as an increase in the limb/breast conservation rate, pathological
response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an independent prognostic marker
in osteosarcoma (1) and breast carcinoma (2). We report three cases of
soft tissue sarcoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Case 1: a 50 year old man presented with malignant
fibrous histiocytoma of the right thigh. After two cycles of neoadjuvant
doxorubicin (75mgm-2), there was clinical and radiological disease progression,
and he proceeded to immediate surgery. There was 90% tumour cell necrosis
in the operative tumour specimen. Further doxorubicin was given as adjuvant
therapy.
Case 2: a 47 year old woman presented with a high
grade liposarcoma of the right thigh. She received one cycle of neoadjuvant
doxorubicin (75mgm-2). There was clinical progression of the primary tumour,
and she went forward to surgery immediately. A high degree of tumour necrosis
was seen in the pathological specimen.
Case 3: a 44 year old man presented with a right
thigh high grade malignant fibrous histiocytoma. He received three cycles
of ifosfamide (5gm-2)/adriamycin (50mgm-2). MRI scan showed enlargement
of the tumour, with central necrosis. The surgical pathological specimen
showed evidence of chemotherapeutic damage with scattered tumour cells
in a background of reactive collagen and extensive haemorrhage.
Each of these patients received pre-operative chemotherapy
with the aim of enabling limb conservation. In each case there was clinical
and/or radiological disease progression within three cycles of chemotherapy
and patients had early surgery. Histologic examination of each operative
specimen revealed extensive tumour cell necrosis.
These favourable pathological responses were at odds with
the clinical and radiological evidence of progressive disease by standard
response criteria. Two of these patients were in clinical trials of chemotherapy
and were recorded to have progressive disease when there was clearly an
antitumour effect. In cases of early progression of a primary soft tissue
sarcoma on chemotherapy, we recommend that investigators should consider
either biopsy or dynamic gadolinium enhanced MRI scanning to detect pathological
responses, which are unexpected on clinical and conventional radiological
assessment
1. Davis A.M. Bell R.S. Goodwin P.J. Prognostic factors
in osteosarcoma: a critical review. Journal of Clinical Oncology 12(2)
423-431, 1994.
2. Fisher B, Bryant J, Wolmark N, Namounas E, Brown A, Fisher ER, Wickerham
DL. Effect of preoperative chem
|