Posters—
Surgical Treatment of Sarcomas
LONG-TERM
FOLLOW-UP OF GIANT CELL TUMOR OF THE SACRUM TREATED WITH SELECTIVE ARTERIAL
EMBOLIZATION AND OTHER MODALITIES
Lin PP, Guzel VB, Moura MF, Morello FA Jr, Benjamin
RS, Gokaslan ZL, Weber KL, and Yasko AW (University of Texas MD Anderson
Cancer Center Box 106, Houston TX 77030 USA)
Introduction: Giant cell tumor of the sacrum is difficult
to manage. Standard treatment, including surgery and radiation, are associated
with significant complications and high relapse rates. The goal of this
study is to evaluate the long-term outcome of arterial embolization.
Methods: From 1975 to 2000, 21 patients were treated
for giant cell tumor of the sacrum, of which 10 had failed previous treatment.
18 patients underwent selective arterial embolization, of which 8 had
bland embolization and 10 had chemoembolization with intra-arterial cis-platin.
One patient did not have embolization because of hypovascularity. Two
patients underwent total sacrectomy. The mean number of embolizations
was 3.8 (range 1 to 7). The median follow-up time was 105 months (range
6 to 205 months). Results: Of the patients who underwent embolization,
four failed to show a positive radiographic response (decrease in vascularity
and increase in peripheral bone formation). Three additional patients
had late failure of treatment. In the most favorable model, the rate of
local control with embolization was 64% at 5 years and 51% at ten years
by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Patients undergoing chemoembolization with intra-arterial
cis-platin did not have significantly better local control than bland
embolization without chemotherapy, but this was not randomized, and in
certain cases a positive effect was noted with cis-platin. Radiation provided
long-term control in 2 patients after failure of other treatments. Three
patients developed radiation sarcomas. Aggressive surgical excision was
effective in obtaining local control, but functional results varied widely.
Discussion and Conclusion: The treatment of sacral
giant cell tumor continues to be problematic. Both surgery and radiation
can result in significant morbidity. Arterial embolization has some efficacy,
but half of the patients will ultimately fail treatment. Nevertheless,
it is a potentially useful modality. A minority of patients can have their
disease controlled by embolization alone. Many patients show a partial
response and, this may make surgical excision safer and less morbid. A
multimodality approach may provide optimal results.
|