Posters—
Surgical Treatment of Sarcomas
SURGERY
FOR SARCOMA OF THE SPINE: OUTCOME ANALYSIS OF 59 PATIENTS OVER A 12-YEAR
PERIOD
Patrick Boland, MD, Mark Bilsky, MD, Murray Brennan, MD,
Robert Woodruff, MD, John Healey, MD, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, NY, NY, USA
Introduction: Sarcomas may present in the spine arising
as primary tumors in the bone or neural elements or as metastatic disease.
While sarcomas are uncommon tumors relative to carcinomas, patients with
these tumors more often come to surgery for spine disease because of their
relative resistance to irradiation and chemotherapy. Surgery is often
employed in order to preserve neurologic function, achieve spinal stability
and improve local disease control. This retrospective study examines the
role of surgery in patients with primary, metastatic or recurrent sarcoma
of the spine.
Methods: 59 patients underwent 99 surgical procedures
for sarcomas involving the spine between 1985 and 1997. The most common
histologic diagnoses were leiomyosarcoma (14) and osteogenic sarcoma 99).
53 tumors resected were high grade. The indications for surgery were:
neurologic compromise (69), oncologic (25) and mechanical instability
(5). The initial type of surgery included laminctomy (29), vertebrectomy
(17) and spondylectomy (17). 3 patients underwent enbloc vertebrectomy.
51 patients underwent radiation therapy and 39 underwent chemotherapy.
Results: The mean survival from the time of initial
diagnosis in all patients was 45 months. Greater than 90% of patients
maintained the ability to ambulate and 30% of patients regained the ability
to ambulate.
Conclusions: Spine surgery for sarcoma is valuable
as a palliative measure to preserve neurologic function and improve quality
of life. En bloc spondylectomy should be undertaken in patients with no
evidence of metastatic disease in whom there is a potential for cure.
|