|
PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN SOFT TISSUE SARCOMAS (STS)
1Stefanovski PD, 2De Paoli A, 1Buonadonna
A, 3Bidoli E, 1Frustaci S. 1Division
of Medical Oncology, 2Division of Radiation Therapy, 3Division
of Epidemiology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, Aviano, Italy.
Aim of the study: To identify specific independent prognostic factors
for overall survival (OS), local recurrence (LR), distant recurrence (DR) and
post-metastasis survival (PMS) in STS pts.
Patients & Methods: Retrospective uni- & multivariate analysis
of a prospective data base for 444 pts. with primary STS with different localizations,
treated and followed-up in our Institute from January 1985 until January 1997.
We correlated: age, sex, performance status (PS)(ECOG/WHO), hemoglobin value
(Hgb), size, histology, grade (Broders/TNM), TNM stage (UICC/AJCC), local relapse
and distant metastasis (DM).
Results: Median age of the patients was 53 years (range 10 to 95) with
median follow-up time of 35,6 months.
| UNIVARIATE
& MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS |
| variable |
OS
|
LR
|
DR
|
PMS
|
| |
p |
p° |
p |
p° |
p |
p° |
p |
p° |
| Age (>50y)° |
0,005 |
0,001 |
|
|
0,02 |
0,04 |
0,03 |
0,02 |
| Hgb (<10g/dL) |
0,001 |
0,04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| PS (>2°) |
0,0001 |
0,0001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Grade (high)° |
0,0001 |
0,004 |
0,05 |
0,01 |
0,0001 |
0,0001 |
|
|
| Size (>5cm)° |
0,0001 |
0,0006 |
|
|
0,0003 |
0,01 |
|
|
| Stage (advanced)° |
0,0001 |
0,0001 |
0,03 |
0,02°° |
0,0001 |
0,0001 |
|
|
| DM |
0,0001 |
0,0001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Histology |
|
|
0,02 |
|
0,004 |
0,03°°° |
|
|
| Site |
|
|
|
|
0,03 |
|
|
|
| Trunk |
|
0,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Head &
Neck |
|
0,02 |
|
|
|
|
|
0,04 |
| Retriperitoneal |
|
0,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Visceral |
|
0,01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Uterinal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Leiuomyosarcoma |
|
0,04 |
|
|
|
0,002 |
|
|
| SinovialSarcoma |
|
0,05 |
|
|
|
|
|
0,02 |
| NOS STS |
|
0,03 |
|
|
|
|
|
0,02 |
Conclusions: 1) Different prognostic factors are significant for different
end points in STS pts; 2) UICC/AJCC TNM staging system for STS has stronger
prognostic significance for the end points of OS and DR compared to those of
LR and is not significant for PMS; 3) Local relapse has no prognostic
value for OS, DR, and PMS; 4) Particular histologic subtypes and localizations
have negative prognostic value for OS, DR, and PMS which could be of importance
in future treatment decisions.
|