|
NOVEL GENOMIC IMBALANCES IN EMBRYONAL RHABDOMYOSARCOMA REVEALED BY COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION AND FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION
Bridge JA, Lui J, Weibolt V, Baker KS, Perry D, Kruger R, Qualman S,
Barr F, Sorensen P, Triche T, Suijkerbuijk R (Meyer Munroe Institute, University
of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-3135).
A comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) approach provides identification
of genomic gains and losses in a tumor specimen in a single experiment. Only
11 embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas (E-RMS) have been previously subjected to CGH.
The underlying genetic events in this histologic subtype are not well defined.
In this investigation, 13 E-RMS specimens from 10 patients entered onto IRS
I-IV and two local patients were analyzed by CGH and fluorescence in situ hybridization
(FISH). Gains of chromosomes or chromosomal regions 2 (62%), 8 (77%), 11q14-22
(69%) and 12q15-21 (62%), and losses of 1p35-36.1 (62%), 6 (54%), 9q13-22 (92%),
16 (77%), 17 (62%), 18 (54%) and 22 (54%) were most prominent. Chromosomal regions
11q14-22 and 9q13-22 represent novel regions of gain and loss, respectively.
Importantly, loss of 9q13-22 corresponds with a putative tumor suppressor gene
(PTCH) mapped to 9q22 and shown to play a role in rhabdomyosarcoma in
a mouse model of Gorlin syndrome1. Gains of 2, 8 and 12 and loss
of 16 were seen in the sole prior E-RMS CGH series2; thus, these
data provide important confirmatory results. In contrast to this previous study,
however, loss not gain, of chromosomes 17 and 18 were observed in the current
study. Chromosome 17 loss correlates well with previous descriptions of frequent
allelic loss of 17p (p53) in E-RMS. In summary, CGH and FISH analyses of 13
E-RMS specimens revealed novel genomic imbalances which may be useful in directing
further molecular studies for the determination of E-RMS critically involved
genes.
- Hahn, H et al. Nature Med 4:619-622, 1998.
- Weber-Hall, S et al. Cancer Res 56:3220-3224, 1996.
This work was supported in part by the John A. Wiebe Childrens Health
Care Fund, the National Childrens Cancer Foundation and the Orthopaedic
Research and Education Foundation.
|